>>8553 What you posted is very much a polished painting, where is the impressionism?

>>8556 i'm not sure what it is you're looking for but Wilfrid de Glehn is an Impressionist painter. OP is an Impressionist piece. >>8553 i am not much of an art guy but i had a section on Impressionism in my college art course, maybe this is a bit basic but Claude Monet's Impression: Sunrise always stood out to me. i like how fuzzy, almost dreamlike it is.

>>8556 like >>8559 said, it was made by a english guy, so it doesn't look like a french impressionism paint. I agree with you, it doesn't really looks like impressionism, its just french painters are more dreamy.

>>8559 >>8559 what did you learn in impressionism class?

>>8572 nta but probably that if an artist is affiliated with a movement then all of his pieces must be considered in the style of the movement, even though they are clearly not, like many of de Glehn's portraits

>>8572 it wasn't an Impressionism class, but a general class about art through the ages. i learned that i like Baroque art and that Andy Warhol should have been dragged into the street and shot like a dog. >>8591 OP seems like an Impressionist piece on the surface from what i can observe. visible/rough brush work, highlights of differences in light, ordinary scenes. is it not an Impressionist piece?

>>8592 It's an impression of an impressionist piece

>>8553 i studied impressionism in an old art class as a main theme but the only artists i really loved were probably Qiang Huang and Erin Hanson

>>8602 whao Im impressed about quang gang ' s painting, I like the effect